Popular, Scholarly, or Trade
An important part of gathering and evaluating sources for research projects is knowing the difference between popular, scholarly, and trade publications.
- Popular Publications are typically written by journalists, freelance writers, and staff writers to entertain, inform, or elicit an emotional response from a general audience.
- Scholarly Publications are written by researchers or experts in a particular field. They use specialized vocabulary, have extensive citations, and are often peer-reviewed.
- Trade Publications may be written by industry experts in a certain industry, but they are not usually considered scholarly, as they share general news, trends, and opinions, rather than advanced research, and are not usually peer-reviewed.
The physical appearance of print sources can also help you identify the type of source. Popular publications and trade publications are usually glossy with many photos. Scholarly journals are usually smaller and thicker with plain covers and images, In electronic sources, you can check for bibliographies and author credentials or affiliations as potential indicators of scholarly sources.
| Popular Publications | Scholarly (including peer-reviewed) | Trade Publications | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content |
Current events; general interest articles |
Research results/reports; reviews of research (review articles); book reviews |
Articles about a certain business or industry |
| Purpose | To inform the public about events and interests, entertain, sell ads, or elicit an emotional response | To share research or scholarship with the academic community | To inform about business or industry news, trends, or products |
| Author | Staff writers, journalists, freelancers | Scholars/researchers | Staff writers, business/industry professionals |
| Audience | General public | Scholars, researchers, students | Business/industry professionals |
| Review | Staff editor | Editorial board made up of other scholars and researchers. Some articles are peer-reviewed | Staff editor |
| Citations | May not have citations, or may be informal (ex. according to... or links) | Bibliographies, references, endnotes, footnotes | Few, may or may not have any |
| Frequency | Weekly/monthly | Quarterly or semi-annually | Weekly/monthly |
| Ads* | Numerous ads for a variety of products | Minimal, usually only for scholarly products like books | Ads are for products geared toward specific industry |
| Examples on Publisher Site | Wall Street Journal; Vogue; New Yorker | American Economic Review; Applied and Environmental Soil Science; BMJ: British Medical Journal; Modern Fictional Studies | Medical Marketing and Media; Litigation |
| Examples in Library Databases | Wall Street Journal; Vogue; New Yorker | American Economic Review; Applied and Environmental Soil Science; BMJ: British Medical Journal; Modern Fictional Studies | Medical Marketing and Media; Litigation |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License from the University of Texas Libraries: Popular, Scholarly, or Trade?. This section was altered to fit the offerings of Moye Library, University of Mount Olive.
Evaluating Sources with the P.R.O.V.E.N. Method
Use the custom guides linked below to help you evaluate resources. The second guide is in a worksheet format if you would like space to fill in your responses to the reflection questions. These questions represent things to think about when deciding if a resource is right for your needs and whether it is a reliable source. You do not have to answer every question to effectively evaluate a resource. Instead, consider these questions as things to think about as you decide whether a source works for you.
- P.R.O.V.E.N. Evaluation GuideThis link enables you to download a source evaluation guide.
- P.R.O.V.E.N. Evaluation Guide WorksheetThis version of the guide has space to digitally fill in answers to the questions.
